<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Spirit is a Bone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danieltutt.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danieltutt.com</link>
	<description>&#34;The truth is that which runs after the truth.&#34; Lacan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Name Dropping and Evangelizing Philosophy by Andrew Albert J. Ty</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2012/02/13/on-name-dropping-and-evangelizing-philosophy/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Albert J. Ty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=1120#comment-961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I&#039;m quite ready yet to do the homework that ends this blog entry, but I must say that I enjoyed reading this, not just as a philosophy amateur in all senses of the terms, but also because as someone who is &quot;into&quot; poetry, most of what you say here makes a whole lot of sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m quite ready yet to do the homework that ends this blog entry, but I must say that I enjoyed reading this, not just as a philosophy amateur in all senses of the terms, but also because as someone who is &#8220;into&#8221; poetry, most of what you say here makes a whole lot of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mysticism, Sufism and Positive Unknowing by Laura</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2012/01/22/mysticism-sufism-and-positive-unknowing/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=803#comment-939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for thie great article. I&#039;m especially intrigued by your experience in India -- morning prayer and chanting has the potential to be absolutely mind-blowing. I&#039;ve never had the pleasure of experiencing a chanting session in another country or culture, but some of my most contemplative moments have been in a room full of chanting people.
Thanks for the &#039;Oblivion Seekers&#039; recommendation - haven&#039;t read that.
Have you heard of Master Charles Cannon? He&#039;s an inspiration of mine in the field of spirituality and mysticism. I love his book &quot;The Modern Mystic&quot; and I just picked up his newest book, &quot;Forgiving the Unforgivable&quot; (http://forgivingtheunforgivable.com).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for thie great article. I&#8217;m especially intrigued by your experience in India &#8212; morning prayer and chanting has the potential to be absolutely mind-blowing. I&#8217;ve never had the pleasure of experiencing a chanting session in another country or culture, but some of my most contemplative moments have been in a room full of chanting people.<br />
Thanks for the &#8216;Oblivion Seekers&#8217; recommendation &#8211; haven&#8217;t read that.<br />
Have you heard of Master Charles Cannon? He&#8217;s an inspiration of mine in the field of spirituality and mysticism. I love his book &#8220;The Modern Mystic&#8221; and I just picked up his newest book, &#8220;Forgiving the Unforgivable&#8221; (<a href="http://forgivingtheunforgivable.com" rel="nofollow">http://forgivingtheunforgivable.com</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Would Nietzsche Say About Europe&#8217;s Islam Crisis? by Bernardo Alonso Alonso</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/07/24/what-would-nietzsche-say-about-europes-islam-crisis/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernardo Alonso Alonso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=671#comment-902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nietzsche was super racist. Hundreds and hundreds of Nietzsche&#039;s original phrases reveal an explicit biological, social and personal criminal racist (anti-deutsch, and non anti-semite, sure! but convicted racist against all non european aryan supposed  superior peoples). These texts are hidden or manipulate by certain ideologists with less ignorance that mauvase foi. Sorry, but see yourself the texts still at work, with some citations in german and spanish, and, I hope, soon in english: www.alonsofia.com/nietzsche Mensch.html
Who&#039;s nonsense, my dear Nobel, me, Nietzsche, or you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nietzsche was super racist. Hundreds and hundreds of Nietzsche&#8217;s original phrases reveal an explicit biological, social and personal criminal racist (anti-deutsch, and non anti-semite, sure! but convicted racist against all non european aryan supposed  superior peoples). These texts are hidden or manipulate by certain ideologists with less ignorance that mauvase foi. Sorry, but see yourself the texts still at work, with some citations in german and spanish, and, I hope, soon in english: <a href="http://www.alonsofia.com/nietzsche" rel="nofollow">http://www.alonsofia.com/nietzsche</a> Mensch.html<br />
Who&#8217;s nonsense, my dear Nobel, me, Nietzsche, or you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mysticism, Sufism and Positive Unknowing by Ron Krumpos</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2012/01/22/mysticism-sufism-and-positive-unknowing/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Krumpos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=803#comment-891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[St. John of the Cross said &lt;i&gt;“All that the imagination can imagine and the reason conceive and understand in this life is not, and cannot be, a proximate means of union with God.”&lt;/i&gt;

   Scriptures, theologians and many religious leaders tell us what the divine &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; by listing grandiose attributes. Most mystics worship personal aspects of the divine, but they also speak of what it &lt;i&gt;is not&lt;/i&gt;. Many of them said that the divine &lt;i&gt;essence&lt;/i&gt; is nothing, i.e. &lt;i&gt;no thing&lt;/i&gt;, that it is immanent in all things, yet it is transcendent to everything. Mystics consider this seeming paradox to be a positive negation.

  &lt;i&gt;Avidya&lt;/i&gt;, non-knowledge in Sanskrit, is used in Buddhism for our “spiritual ignorance” of the true nature of Reality. &lt;i&gt;Bila kaif&lt;/i&gt;, without knowing how in Arabic, is Islam’s term for “without comparison” to describe Allah. &lt;i&gt;Ein Sof&lt;/i&gt;, without end in Hebrew, is the “infinite beyond description” in the Kabbalah. &lt;i&gt;Neti, neti&lt;/i&gt;, not this, not this in Sanskrit, refers to “unreality of appearances” to define Brahman. In &lt;i&gt;via negativa&lt;/i&gt;, the way of negation in Latin, God is “not open to observation or description.”

   Mysticism emphasizes spiritual &lt;i&gt;knowing&lt;/i&gt;, which is not rational and is independent of reason, logic or images. &lt;i&gt;Da`at&lt;/i&gt; is Hebrew for “the secret sphere of knowledge on the cosmic tree.” &lt;i&gt;Gnosis&lt;/i&gt; is Greek for the “intuitive apprehension of spiritual truths.” &lt;i&gt;Jnana&lt;/i&gt; is Sanskrit for “knowledge of the way” to approach Brahman. &lt;i&gt;Ma`rifa&lt;/i&gt; in Arabic is “knowledge of the inner truth.” &lt;i&gt;Panna&lt;/i&gt; in Pali is “direct awareness”; perfect wisdom. These modes of suprarational knowing, perhaps described as complete intuitive insight, are not divine oneness; they are actualizing our inherent abilities to come closer to the goal.

(quoted from &quot;the greatest achievement in life,&quot; my free ebook on comparative mysticism)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St. John of the Cross said <i>“All that the imagination can imagine and the reason conceive and understand in this life is not, and cannot be, a proximate means of union with God.”</i></p>
<p>   Scriptures, theologians and many religious leaders tell us what the divine <i>is</i> by listing grandiose attributes. Most mystics worship personal aspects of the divine, but they also speak of what it <i>is not</i>. Many of them said that the divine <i>essence</i> is nothing, i.e. <i>no thing</i>, that it is immanent in all things, yet it is transcendent to everything. Mystics consider this seeming paradox to be a positive negation.</p>
<p>  <i>Avidya</i>, non-knowledge in Sanskrit, is used in Buddhism for our “spiritual ignorance” of the true nature of Reality. <i>Bila kaif</i>, without knowing how in Arabic, is Islam’s term for “without comparison” to describe Allah. <i>Ein Sof</i>, without end in Hebrew, is the “infinite beyond description” in the Kabbalah. <i>Neti, neti</i>, not this, not this in Sanskrit, refers to “unreality of appearances” to define Brahman. In <i>via negativa</i>, the way of negation in Latin, God is “not open to observation or description.”</p>
<p>   Mysticism emphasizes spiritual <i>knowing</i>, which is not rational and is independent of reason, logic or images. <i>Da`at</i> is Hebrew for “the secret sphere of knowledge on the cosmic tree.” <i>Gnosis</i> is Greek for the “intuitive apprehension of spiritual truths.” <i>Jnana</i> is Sanskrit for “knowledge of the way” to approach Brahman. <i>Ma`rifa</i> in Arabic is “knowledge of the inner truth.” <i>Panna</i> in Pali is “direct awareness”; perfect wisdom. These modes of suprarational knowing, perhaps described as complete intuitive insight, are not divine oneness; they are actualizing our inherent abilities to come closer to the goal.</p>
<p>(quoted from &#8220;the greatest achievement in life,&#8221; my free ebook on comparative mysticism)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Daniel Tutt</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/bio/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Tutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?page_id=464#comment-886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martha, 

I&#039;m going to try and make the font darker. Sorry that it isn&#039;t read-able. 

Best,
Daniel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martha, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try and make the font darker. Sorry that it isn&#8217;t read-able. </p>
<p>Best,<br />
Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interfaith Dialogue / Stereotypes of Islam and Muslims by Dr. McClay</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2008/06/07/interfaith-dialogue-stereotypes-of-islam-and-muslims/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. McClay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/2008/06/07/interfaith-dialogue-stereotypes-of-islam-and-muslims#comment-874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Interfaith dialogue is a must today, and the first step in establishing it is forgetting the past, ignoring polemical arguments, and giving precedence to common points, which far outnumber polemical ones.&quot;  (Fethullah Gulen)
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fethullah-gulen.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fethullah Gulen&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fethullah-gulen.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fethullah Gulen News&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rumiforum.org/about/fethullah-gulen.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Interfaith dialogue is a must today, and the first step in establishing it is forgetting the past, ignoring polemical arguments, and giving precedence to common points, which far outnumber polemical ones.&#8221;  (Fethullah Gulen)<br />
<a href="http://www.fethullah-gulen.org/" rel="nofollow">Fethullah Gulen</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fethullah-gulen.net/" rel="nofollow">Fethullah Gulen News</a><br />
<a href="http://www.rumiforum.org/about/fethullah-gulen.html" rel="nofollow">More</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Martha Senger</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/bio/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martha Senger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?page_id=464#comment-856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wish the print was darker so i could read what seems to be a great essay!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wish the print was darker so i could read what seems to be a great essay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the Revolutionary Subject? by What is a Contradiction? Badiou&#8217;s Theory of the Subject &#171; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/11/11/what-is-the-revolutionary-subject/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What is a Contradiction? Badiou&#8217;s Theory of the Subject &#171; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=756#comment-852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a previous post on Badiou&#8217;s Theory of the Subject, I described how the subject disappears under the chain of the signifiers, and how the masses [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous post on Badiou&#8217;s Theory of the Subject, I described how the subject disappears under the chain of the signifiers, and how the masses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Books of 2011: A List by Sahar Taman</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2012/01/01/the-best-books-of-2011-a-list/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sahar Taman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=953#comment-731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Daniel.  I love to read anything from you!  Wishing you a Happy New Year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Daniel.  I love to read anything from you!  Wishing you a Happy New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three Key Ideas About Conservatism. Review of &#8220;The Reactionary Mind&#8221; by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/11/06/three-key-ideas-about-conservatism-review-of-the-reactionary-mind/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=770#comment-729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8211; a lovely piece of intellectual history that is well documented and well put-together. I wrote a review of this book, and I highly recommend [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; a lovely piece of intellectual history that is well documented and well put-together. I wrote a review of this book, and I highly recommend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Art and Philosophy in Badiou&#8217;s HANDBOOK OF INAESTHETICS by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/01/23/art-and-philosophy-in-badious-handbook-of-inaesthetics/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=495#comment-728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 6. Handbook of Inaesthetics by Alain Badiou &#8211; this was the first book I read by Badiou and it was excellent. Review here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6. Handbook of Inaesthetics by Alain Badiou &#8211; this was the first book I read by Badiou and it was excellent. Review here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Riding the Rift&#8221; &#8211; Reflections on time and democracy in the Arab revolutions by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/03/31/riding-the-rift-reflections-on-time-and-democracy-in-the-arab-revolutions/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=542#comment-726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 11. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed by William Connolly &#8211; very accesible Deleuzian scholar blending a million different disciplines, but its worth the read. See my review here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed by William Connolly &#8211; very accesible Deleuzian scholar blending a million different disciplines, but its worth the read. See my review here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Open System: Jameson’s “The Hegel Variations” by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/02/26/the-open-system-jameson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cthe-hegel-variations%e2%80%9d/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I would be remiss not to include Fred Jameson&#8217;s new short book on the Phenomenology called the Hegel Variations, for which I reviewed, here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would be remiss not to include Fred Jameson&#8217;s new short book on the Phenomenology called the Hegel Variations, for which I reviewed, here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Womb and the Matrix: Psychoanalysis and Birth by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/09/05/the-womb-and-the-matrix-psychoanalysis-and-birth/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=697#comment-724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 27. The Matrixial Borderspace by Bracha Ettinger &#8211; is simply fabulous. See my review here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 27. The Matrixial Borderspace by Bracha Ettinger &#8211; is simply fabulous. See my review here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Defense of Freedom by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2010/12/12/brooksonfranzen/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=430#comment-723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 18. Freedom by Jonathan Franzen &#8211; it was very good. Read my review here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 18. Freedom by Jonathan Franzen &#8211; it was very good. Read my review here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is an Apparatus? by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/07/19/what-is-an-apparatus/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=665#comment-722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 9. What is a Paradigm? by Giorgio Agamben &#8211; very good essay. Reviewed it, here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9. What is a Paradigm? by Giorgio Agamben &#8211; very good essay. Reviewed it, here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Other&#8217;s Other: Alienation After Derrida by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/01/02/the-others-other-alienation-after-derrida/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=474#comment-721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by Simon Skempton &#8211; this was the first book of 2011 that I started to read. I reviewed it here, and found it to be hugely [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Simon Skempton &#8211; this was the first book of 2011 that I started to read. I reviewed it here, and found it to be hugely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anything is Possible? Lacan, Meillaisoux and the Ancestral by The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/10/11/anything-is-possible-lacan-mellaisoux-and-the-ancestral/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Best Books of 2011: A List &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=712#comment-720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2. After Finitude: An Essay on Contingency by Quentin Meillaisoux &#8211; an exceedingly brilliant essay that has begun to usher in a paradigm shift in philosophy, see my post on it here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. After Finitude: An Essay on Contingency by Quentin Meillaisoux &#8211; an exceedingly brilliant essay that has begun to usher in a paradigm shift in philosophy, see my post on it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Would Nietzsche Say About Europe&#8217;s Islam Crisis? by Nobel</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/07/24/what-would-nietzsche-say-about-europes-islam-crisis/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nobel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=671#comment-673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s nonsense, Bernardo.  Nietzsche was concerned with the decay of European culture, not just blonde, blue eyed white men.  He believed that Europe was the most fit to continent to lead humanity into its future because he believed that Europe had the most developed civilization.  

You, apparently, think that he was more superficial than he actually was.  The blonde beast referred to the nature of the lion.  He identified the Japanese and the Zulu peoples as blonde beasts (lion hearts), but none of them are blonde.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nonsense, Bernardo.  Nietzsche was concerned with the decay of European culture, not just blonde, blue eyed white men.  He believed that Europe was the most fit to continent to lead humanity into its future because he believed that Europe had the most developed civilization.  </p>
<p>You, apparently, think that he was more superficial than he actually was.  The blonde beast referred to the nature of the lion.  He identified the Japanese and the Zulu peoples as blonde beasts (lion hearts), but none of them are blonde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Gnosticism and Imperialism in James Cameron&#8217;s Avatar by neel</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2009/12/30/digital-gnosticism-and-imperialism-in-james-camerons-avatar/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/digital-gnosticism-and-imperialism-in-james-camerons-avatar#comment-645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the root every being is one and the same,every being is the absolute who experiences its own nature through the means of the body.The concept of avatar should be understood in this context.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the root every being is one and the same,every being is the absolute who experiences its own nature through the means of the body.The concept of avatar should be understood in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Riding the Rift&#8221; &#8211; Reflections on time and democracy in the Arab revolutions by Becoming Noble: Time and Affect in the American Autumn and the Arab Spring &#124; Spirit is a Bone</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/03/31/riding-the-rift-reflections-on-time-and-democracy-in-the-arab-revolutions/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becoming Noble: Time and Affect in the American Autumn and the Arab Spring &#124; Spirit is a Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=542#comment-576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Condition on the role of affect in the Occupy Wall Street protests got me thinking about some musings I had over the role of time and pace in the Arab Spring. I&#8217;d like to suggest that of all that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Condition on the role of affect in the Occupy Wall Street protests got me thinking about some musings I had over the role of time and pace in the Arab Spring. I&#8217;d like to suggest that of all that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video: Hegel and Lacan Seminar &#8211; Master and Slave by Daniel Tutt</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/06/07/video-hegel-and-lacan-seminar-master-and-slave/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Tutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=657#comment-571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris: 

I don&#039;t understand your point?  Can you say more?

Curiously,
Daniel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand your point?  Can you say more?</p>
<p>Curiously,<br />
Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video: Hegel and Lacan Seminar &#8211; Master and Slave by Chris</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/06/07/video-hegel-and-lacan-seminar-master-and-slave/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=657#comment-570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol, Hegel CRITICIZES the phrenologists for believing that &quot;spirit is a BONE&quot;.....you seem to be advocating on behalf of Hegel....I think you should put down the Lacan and read more Hegel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, Hegel CRITICIZES the phrenologists for believing that &#8220;spirit is a BONE&#8221;&#8230;..you seem to be advocating on behalf of Hegel&#8230;.I think you should put down the Lacan and read more Hegel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The #Occupy Movement and Gramsci by What has Pandora&#8217;s Box got to do with Handbags? &#124; Fun Things To Do With</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/10/16/the-occupy-movement-gramsci-and-the-nation/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What has Pandora&#8217;s Box got to do with Handbags? &#124; Fun Things To Do With]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=726#comment-568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] #split {}#single {}#splitalign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}#singlealign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}#splittitlebox {text-align: center;}#singletitlebox {text-align: center;}.linkboxtext {line-height: 1.4em;}.linkboxcontainer {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;background-color:#eeeeee;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px; border-style:solid;}.linkboxdisplay {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;}.linkboxdisplay td {text-align: center;}.linkboxdisplay a:link {text-decoration: none;}.linkboxdisplay a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} function opensingledropdown() { document.getElementById(&#039;singletablelinks&#039;).style.display = &#039;&#039;; document.getElementById(&#039;singlemouse&#039;).style.display = &#039;none&#039;; } function closesingledropdown() { document.getElementById(&#039;singletablelinks&#039;).style.display = &#039;none&#039;; document.getElementById(&#039;singlemouse&#039;).style.display = &#039;&#039;; } Fellowes 61301 Bankers Box Decorative Magazine Files, Letter &#8211; Mocha Brown (6 Pack)The Split as IllusionCSS3 Flexible Box Layout ExplainedLaura Benanti Performs at Landmark on Main Street TonightThe 6 Yard Box-Blogging from S. Africa 6/13/10Partial TruthsBeta-carotene vs. RetinolDemons and PossessionThe #Occupy Movement, Gramsci, and the Nation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #split {}#single {}#splitalign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}#singlealign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}#splittitlebox {text-align: center;}#singletitlebox {text-align: center;}.linkboxtext {line-height: 1.4em;}.linkboxcontainer {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;background-color:#eeeeee;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px; border-style:solid;}.linkboxdisplay {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;}.linkboxdisplay td {text-align: center;}.linkboxdisplay a:link {text-decoration: none;}.linkboxdisplay a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} function opensingledropdown() { document.getElementById(&#039;singletablelinks&#039;).style.display = &#039;&#039;; document.getElementById(&#039;singlemouse&#039;).style.display = &#039;none&#039;; } function closesingledropdown() { document.getElementById(&#039;singletablelinks&#039;).style.display = &#039;none&#039;; document.getElementById(&#039;singlemouse&#039;).style.display = &#039;&#039;; } Fellowes 61301 Bankers Box Decorative Magazine Files, Letter &#8211; Mocha Brown (6 Pack)The Split as IllusionCSS3 Flexible Box Layout ExplainedLaura Benanti Performs at Landmark on Main Street TonightThe 6 Yard Box-Blogging from S. Africa 6/13/10Partial TruthsBeta-carotene vs. RetinolDemons and PossessionThe #Occupy Movement, Gramsci, and the Nation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The #Occupy Movement and Gramsci by 42</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/10/16/the-occupy-movement-gramsci-and-the-nation/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=726#comment-555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You seem to have skipped the small sentence in the Hegemony book where they say that no institution is required for agonistic pluralism to exist, and as long as it is institutionalized you cannot talk about political disobedience, as you are taking away the emancipatory character of this movement by trying to put it in a context of an institution in this case the nation. And what you are suggesting is to turn the movement in fact into a populist movement, which from the European perspective is not a nice thing to do, look up Bosnia and Herzegovina for example, as patriotism or as it is called in Europe, nationalism  in itself is an agency of exclusion, where you are perpetuating an idea of subjectivity through the collective sphere, giving it a determiner, and by saying that the idea of America is a symbol for the movement than you are making it a nationalist movement, thus forgetting that you are going beyond the phantasm the nation state has created throughout history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to have skipped the small sentence in the Hegemony book where they say that no institution is required for agonistic pluralism to exist, and as long as it is institutionalized you cannot talk about political disobedience, as you are taking away the emancipatory character of this movement by trying to put it in a context of an institution in this case the nation. And what you are suggesting is to turn the movement in fact into a populist movement, which from the European perspective is not a nice thing to do, look up Bosnia and Herzegovina for example, as patriotism or as it is called in Europe, nationalism  in itself is an agency of exclusion, where you are perpetuating an idea of subjectivity through the collective sphere, giving it a determiner, and by saying that the idea of America is a symbol for the movement than you are making it a nationalist movement, thus forgetting that you are going beyond the phantasm the nation state has created throughout history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metaphysicians in the Dark: Philosophy and Poetry’s Age Old Quarrel by Toby Simmons</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/08/24/metaphysicians-in-the-dark-philosophy-and-poetry%e2%80%99s-age-old-quarrel/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toby Simmons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=692#comment-539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm. Very, very interesting indeed. You raise a number of very important issues. I shall have to think further about them . . .
A great blog all-round, by the way. Let me know what you think of mine . . .
http://apieceofcoffee.wordpress.com/
Keep on posting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Very, very interesting indeed. You raise a number of very important issues. I shall have to think further about them . . .<br />
A great blog all-round, by the way. Let me know what you think of mine . . .<br />
<a href="http://apieceofcoffee.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://apieceofcoffee.wordpress.com/</a><br />
Keep on posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Womb and the Matrix: Psychoanalysis and Birth by Anirudh Kumar Satsangi</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/09/05/the-womb-and-the-matrix-psychoanalysis-and-birth/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anirudh Kumar Satsangi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=697#comment-536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have established an analogy between practice of meditation and psychoanalysis.

Julian B. Rotter (1970) writes in his book Clinical Psychology “Other professions which overlap clinical psychology are those of the psychiatrist, social worker, lawyer, speech pathologist, and religious worker. All these professions are concerned in one way or another with the individual’s adjustment to a special set of circumstances”.

Now the question arises what does a religious worker does to help an individual for his/her adjustment with himself/herself and with the society? The one apparent answer is guiding people to perform devotional exercises.

Perhaps answer lies in the following lines:

Psychoanalysis emphasizes free association, the phenomenon of transference, and the development of insight. Psychoanalysis helps a person understand himself/herself better. The goal of psychoanalysis is to acquire self-understanding and knowledge of the sources of anxiety.

According to Swami Vivekananda, “During meditation the mind is at first apt to wander. But let any desire whatever arise in the mind, we must sit calmly and watch what sort of ideas are coming. By continuing to watch in that way the mind becomes calm, and there are no more thoughts waves in it. Those things that we have previously thought deeply have stored into unconscious mind and therefore these come up at the surface of conscious mind during meditation.” We may call this ‘auto-catharsis’ sort of free-association, unconscious mind talking to conscious mind. Meditation provides us insight, understanding of self and increases our psychological strength. So we can draw some analogy between practice of meditation and psychoanalysis. .

According to Swami Vishnu Devananda:”Through meditation, the play of the mind is witnessed. In the early stages nothing more can be done than to gain understanding as the ego is observed constantly asserting itself. But in times its game become familiar, and one begins to prefer the peace of contentment. When the ego is subdued, energies can then be utilized constructively for personal growth and the service of others”.

According to Radhasoami Faith: “…strong desires, embedded in the mind, are awakened in Bhajan (a type of meditation) by the current of Shabd (sound).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have established an analogy between practice of meditation and psychoanalysis.</p>
<p>Julian B. Rotter (1970) writes in his book Clinical Psychology “Other professions which overlap clinical psychology are those of the psychiatrist, social worker, lawyer, speech pathologist, and religious worker. All these professions are concerned in one way or another with the individual’s adjustment to a special set of circumstances”.</p>
<p>Now the question arises what does a religious worker does to help an individual for his/her adjustment with himself/herself and with the society? The one apparent answer is guiding people to perform devotional exercises.</p>
<p>Perhaps answer lies in the following lines:</p>
<p>Psychoanalysis emphasizes free association, the phenomenon of transference, and the development of insight. Psychoanalysis helps a person understand himself/herself better. The goal of psychoanalysis is to acquire self-understanding and knowledge of the sources of anxiety.</p>
<p>According to Swami Vivekananda, “During meditation the mind is at first apt to wander. But let any desire whatever arise in the mind, we must sit calmly and watch what sort of ideas are coming. By continuing to watch in that way the mind becomes calm, and there are no more thoughts waves in it. Those things that we have previously thought deeply have stored into unconscious mind and therefore these come up at the surface of conscious mind during meditation.” We may call this ‘auto-catharsis’ sort of free-association, unconscious mind talking to conscious mind. Meditation provides us insight, understanding of self and increases our psychological strength. So we can draw some analogy between practice of meditation and psychoanalysis. .</p>
<p>According to Swami Vishnu Devananda:”Through meditation, the play of the mind is witnessed. In the early stages nothing more can be done than to gain understanding as the ego is observed constantly asserting itself. But in times its game become familiar, and one begins to prefer the peace of contentment. When the ego is subdued, energies can then be utilized constructively for personal growth and the service of others”.</p>
<p>According to Radhasoami Faith: “…strong desires, embedded in the mind, are awakened in Bhajan (a type of meditation) by the current of Shabd (sound).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Catastrophes Virtual? &#8211; Žižek Up Close by Towards an Ethics of Precariousness &#171; Daniel Tutt</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2010/10/14/are-catastrophes-virtual-zizek-up-close/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Towards an Ethics of Precariousness &#171; Daniel Tutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=386#comment-519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] her lecture. While I had encountered Zizek on this precise topic of ethics a few months ago at the University of Penn lecture series, I was already reading into her argument through a lens of doubt. Doubt precisely about the use and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] her lecture. While I had encountered Zizek on this precise topic of ethics a few months ago at the University of Penn lecture series, I was already reading into her argument through a lens of doubt. Doubt precisely about the use and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Would Nietzsche Say About Europe&#8217;s Islam Crisis? by Bernardo Alonso Alonso</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/07/24/what-would-nietzsche-say-about-europes-islam-crisis/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernardo Alonso Alonso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieltutt.com/?p=671#comment-518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.danieltutt.com

After reading the entire work of F.Nietzsche, one understand his admiration of Islamic culture while strong in the conquest of other peoples, powerful and “mänlich”. The opposite of hated christianism (and socialism), religion and politics of weak and poor people. Aber Nietzsche was obssesed with de reproduction with a unique dominant human race white and blond  (european man!),  even with the extintion or  submission as slaves of all the rest of peoples and races in the world.
Anders Behring Breivik appropriate zehnmal Nietzsche’s words. With reason and without. I explane that a little in my web site: alonsofia.com.
Nietzsche was and is today dangerous dynamite!
Bernardo Alonso Alonso]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.danieltutt.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.danieltutt.com</a></p>
<p>After reading the entire work of F.Nietzsche, one understand his admiration of Islamic culture while strong in the conquest of other peoples, powerful and “mänlich”. The opposite of hated christianism (and socialism), religion and politics of weak and poor people. Aber Nietzsche was obssesed with de reproduction with a unique dominant human race white and blond  (european man!),  even with the extintion or  submission as slaves of all the rest of peoples and races in the world.<br />
Anders Behring Breivik appropriate zehnmal Nietzsche’s words. With reason and without. I explane that a little in my web site: alonsofia.com.<br />
Nietzsche was and is today dangerous dynamite!<br />
Bernardo Alonso Alonso</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chimney Sweeping by Maija</title>
		<link>http://danieltutt.com/2011/04/17/chimney-sweeping/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maija]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritisabone.wordpress.com/?p=555#comment-286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.  I like the conclusion that the question is wrong.  I kind of think that about most philosophy in general, actually!  Too bad Aristotle came before Spinoza, who said that melancholy or mania result from LACK of sufficient self-knowledge.  I favor Spinoza here (and usually.)  When did the self become split?  Why do we understand ourselves that way?  Is it really split, or are we just living in an unnatural world with so many contradictions we don&#039;t know how to react?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I like the conclusion that the question is wrong.  I kind of think that about most philosophy in general, actually!  Too bad Aristotle came before Spinoza, who said that melancholy or mania result from LACK of sufficient self-knowledge.  I favor Spinoza here (and usually.)  When did the self become split?  Why do we understand ourselves that way?  Is it really split, or are we just living in an unnatural world with so many contradictions we don&#8217;t know how to react?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

